Skip to main content
QINMO Smart Manufacturing
中EN

Applications

The same part calls for entirely different processes at proof of concept and at pilot production. Choosing by stage costs less than choosing by process.

Matched to stage

Concept, appearance, functional, engineering validation and pilot each ask different questions.

Avoid over-building

Concept work does not need production tolerance. Save the budget for the stage that does.

Just describe the question

Unsure which process? Tell us what needs validating and engineers will advise.

Choose the process for the stage

There are two common wastes. One is machining metal at concept stage, then scrapping the design and realising the money only validated a shape nobody wants. The other is functional testing on printed parts, where the strength data cannot be used at all.

Each stage answers a different question and tolerates different cost and precision. Get it right and the budget goes where it moves a decision forward.

Rough trade-offs by stage

Concept wants speed and low cost. The shape is enough; precision and material can give way.

Appearance needs surface and colour that represent the final product; internal structure can be simplified.

Functional testing needs material close to production, or the data means nothing.

Engineering validation exists to expose production process problems early, not to make the part look better.

Pilot production demands stable process and batch-to-batch consistency. This is where fixing work holding and tool parameters starts to pay.

Not sure which stage you are at

Say in the enquiry what you are trying to answer — see the shape, show a customer, or run a drop test. Engineers will suggest a process on that basis rather than defaulting to the most expensive option.

Choosing the right process for the stage saves more than negotiating unit price.